Betting List 2: Tie-Break Probability Analysis
– **Tie-Break Likelihood**:
– There’s a high likelihood (95.7%) that no tie-break will occur in the first set.
– **Overall Match Tie-Break**:
– The probability of avoiding a tie-break throughout the entire match stands at 64%.
### Summary
This analysis provides insights into key aspects of the upcoming tennis match, including performance predictions and betting opportunities.
—
### Additional Expert Predictions
#### Expert Predictions for Betting List
##### Betting List for Over/Under Total Games
Betting List for Over/Under Total Games Predictions
Prediction for Over/Under Total Games
##### Betting List for Tie-Break Probability
Betting List for Tie-Break Probability Analysis
—
## Conclusion
This structured template offers a comprehensive approach to analyzing tennis events with detailed sections dedicated to expert predictions and betting lists.
# betting-strategy-analysis-template-for-tennis-events
## Introduction
This document provides a structured template designed to analyze betting strategies specifically tailored for tennis events.
## Overview
The document focuses on providing expert opinions and predictions regarding tennis matches. It includes detailed analysis and insights into various aspects such as player performance, betting odds, and game outcomes.
## Expert Predictions
### General Expert Overview
The upcoming tennis event between Kohlmann de Freitas Enzo de Freitas and Loureiro Joao Victor Couto promises an exciting showdown. Both players have shown exceptional skills in recent tournaments, making this match highly anticipated.
### Betting Lists
#### Betting List 1: Over/Under Total Games
– **Player A**: Based on current form and past performances, there is a strong indication that Player A will outperform expectations.
– **Player B**: Despite recent challenges, Player B’s resilience could lead to surprising outcomes.
#### Betting List 2: Tie-Break Probability
– **First Set Tie-Break**: There is a high probability (95.7%) that no tie-break will occur in the first set.
– **Overall Match Tie-Break**: The likelihood of avoiding a tie-break throughout the entire match is significant at 64%.
## Additional Expert Predictions
### Prediction for Over/Under Total Games
Given the aggressive playing styles and strategic gameplay exhibited by both competitors, it is predicted that:
– The total number of games played will likely exceed expectations.
– Both players are expected to push hard, potentially leading to extended sets.
### Prediction for Tie-Break Probability
Considering the players’ historical performances:
– The first set is expected to conclude without a tie-break.
– The overall match might avoid tie-break scenarios due to decisive gameplay.
## Conclusion
This template serves as a comprehensive guide for analyzing tennis events with a focus on betting strategies. It provides structured insights into player performances and game predictions, aiding bettors in making informed decisions.
—
This document is designed to be adaptable for various tennis events, ensuring detailed analysis and expert-level predictions are consistently provided.
# betting-strategy-analysis-template-for-tennis-events
## Introduction
This document outlines a structured approach to analyzing betting strategies tailored specifically for tennis events.
## Overview
The purpose of this analysis is to provide expert opinions and predictions related to upcoming tennis matches. This includes evaluating player performance metrics, historical data trends, and potential game outcomes.
## Expert Predictions
### General Expert Overview
The upcoming tennis event featuring Kohlmann de Freitas Enzo de Freitas versus Loureiro Joao Victor Couto promises an intense competition. Both players have demonstrated exceptional skills in previous tournaments.
### Betting Lists
#### Betting List 1: Over/Under Total Games
– **Player A**: Based on current form and recent performances, there is a strong indication that Player A may outperform expectations.
– **Player B**: Despite facing some challenges recently, Player B’s resilience could lead to unexpected outcomes.
#### Betting List 2: Tie-Break Probability
– **First Set Tie-Break**: There is a high probability (95.7%) that no tie-break will occur in the first set.
– **Overall Match Tie-Break**: The likelihood of avoiding a tie-break throughout the entire match stands at 64%.
## Additional Expert Predictions
### Prediction for Over/Under Total Games
Given the aggressive playing styles and strategic gameplay exhibited by both competitors:
– The total number of games played is expected to exceed expectations.
– Both players are likely to push hard, potentially leading to extended sets.
### Prediction for Tie-Break Probability
Considering historical performances:
– The first set is anticipated to conclude without requiring a tie-break.
– The overall match might avoid tie-break scenarios due to decisive gameplay.
## Conclusion
This template serves as a comprehensive guide for analyzing tennis events with a focus on betting strategies. It provides structured insights into player performances and game predictions, aiding bettors in making informed decisions.
—
This document is designed to be adaptable across various tennis events, ensuring detailed analysis and expert-level predictions are consistently provided.
NikitaBorisov1979/VIPER/VIPERExample/VIPERExample/Modules/PresentationLayer/Screens/MainScreen/MainViewController.swift
//
// MainViewController.swift
// VIPERExample
//
// Created by Nikita Borisov on 11/19/19.
// Copyright © 2019 Nikita Borisov. All rights reserved.
//
import UIKit
class MainViewController: UIViewController {
// MARK:- IBOutlets
@IBOutlet weak var tableView: UITableView!
// MARK:- Private properties
private var presenter: MainPresenterProtocol!
// MARK:- UIViewController life cycle
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
presenter.viewDidLoad()
}
override func viewWillAppear(_ animated: Bool) {
super.viewWillAppear(animated)
presenter.viewWillAppear()
}
// MARK:- Public methods
func setup(with presenter: MainPresenterProtocol) {
self.presenter = presenter
presenter.configure(viewController: self)
}
}
// MARK:- UITableViewDataSource & UITableViewDelegate
extension MainViewController: UITableViewDataSource & UITableViewDelegate {
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView,
numberOfRowsInSection section: Int) -> Int {
return presenter.numberOfRows(inSection: section)
}
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView,
cellForRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UITableViewCell {
let cell = tableView.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: “MainCell”,for:indexPath) as! MainTableViewCell
presenter.configure(cellAtIndexPath:indexPath,
cellViewModel:&cell.viewModel)
return cell
}
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView,
didSelectRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) {
presenter.didSelectRow(atIndexPath:indexPath)
tableView.deselectRow(at:indexPath,
animated:true)
}
}
NikitaBorisov1979/VIPER/VIPERExample/VIPERExample/Modules/PresentationLayer/Screens/MainScreen/MainPresenter.swift
//
// MainPresenter.swift
// VIPERExample
//
// Created by Nikita Borisov on 11/19/19.
// Copyright © 2019 Nikita Borisov. All rights reserved.
//
import Foundation
protocol MainPresenterProtocol {
/// Initialize dependencies between modules (VIPER pattern).
///
/// – Parameter viewController:
func configure(viewController:UIViewController!)
/// Initialize module state (VIPER pattern).
///
/// – Parameter viewDidLoad:
func viewDidLoad()
/// Initialize module state (VIPER pattern).
///
/// – Parameter viewWillApper:
func viewWillAppear()
/// Returns count rows at section index path (VIPER pattern).
///
/// – Parameter indexPath:
/// – Returns:
func numberOfRows(inSection:Int) -> Int
/// Returns view model at index path (VIPER pattern).
///
/// – Parameter indexPath:
/// – Parameter cellViewModel:
func configure(cellAtIndexPath indexPath : IndexPath,
cellViewModel : inout MainTableViewCellViewModel!)
}
class MainPresenter : NSObject , MainPresenterProtocol{
}
extension MainPresenter : InteractorToMainPresenterProtocol{
}
extension MainPresenter : RouterToMainPresenterProtocol{
}
extension MainPresenter : OutputMainInteractorProtocol{
}
extension MainPresenter : ViewToMainPresenterProtocol{
}
//
// Created by Nikita Borisov on 12/4/19.
// Copyright (c) 2019 Nikita Borisov. All rights reserved.
//
import Foundation
protocol DataSaverProtocol {
}
class DataSaver : DataSaverProtocol{
}
extension DataSaver : DataStorageToDataSaverProtocol{
}# VIPER architecture example written in Swift language
VIPER architecture pattern was created by Nicolas Partain who had previously created MVP architecture pattern . MVP stands for Model View Presenter whereas VIPER stands for View Interactor Presenter Entity Router .
VIPER architecture pattern based on modular approach which separates logic code into modules so each module has its own responsibility which makes it easier maintainable .
In VIPER architecture there are five components :
* View Component :
It represents UI component which displays data provided by Presenter component . In addition , it captures user actions then notifies Presenter component about it .
* Interactor Component :
It handles business logic such as working with database or networking code .
* Presenter Component :
It receives user actions from View component then interacts with Interactor component which performs business logic . After it , Presenter component updates View component .
* Entity Component :
It represents data model .
* Router Component :
It handles navigation between screens . In addition , it creates objects of other components .
# How does VIPER architecture works ?
As we can see from above diagram , View component receives user action then notifies Presenter component about it . After that , Presenter component interacts with Interactor component which performs business logic then returns result back to Presenter component . In addition , Router component creates objects needed by other components .
# What are benefits & disadvantages ?
Benefits :
* It makes code easier maintainable because each component has its own responsibility .
* It makes code more testable .
* It increases productivity because developers don’t need think about design patterns .
* It improves software design .
Disadvantages :
* It requires more boilerplate code than MVC architecture .
* It requires more time than MVC architecture .
# How does VIPER architecture compare with MVC architecture ?
MVC stands for Model View Controller . As we know , MVC architecture pattern was created before VIP