Skip to main content
Главная страница » Tennis » Yazdani, Ali vs Gagliardo, Lorenzo

Yazdani, Ali vs Gagliardo, Lorenzo

Expert Opinion: Yazdani vs. Gagliardo

As we approach the upcoming match between Ali Yazdani and Lorenzo Gagliardo on July 31, 2025, several betting predictions suggest an intriguing contest. Yazdani, known for his aggressive baseline play and powerful forehand, faces a strategic challenge against Gagliardo’s versatile game style and impressive defensive capabilities. The match is expected to be closely contested, with potential implications on various betting markets.

Yazdani, Ali

LWLWW
-

Gagliardo, Lorenzo

WWLWL
Date: 2025-07-31
Time: 07:00
(FT)
Venue: Not Available Yet
Score: 0-2

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Over 1st Set Games57.40%(0-2)
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)91.30%(0-2)
Under 1st Set Games51.40%(0-2)
Tie Break in Match (No)83.30%(0-2)
Under 2.5 Sets69.20%(0-2)
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)60.40%(0-2)
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)54.80%(0-2)

Betting Predictions

Set Dynamics

The prediction for “Over 1st Set Games” at 61.30 suggests a belief in a relatively high-scoring first set. Given Yazdani’s tendency to dominate points with his aggressive play, this could manifest if he capitalizes early. However, Gagliardo’s defensive prowess might counteract this, making the “Under 1st Set Games” at 50.80 also a viable consideration.

Tie Break Probabilities

The odds against a tie break in the first set stand at 91.90, indicating a strong expectation that one player will secure a clear victory within six games. This aligns with historical data showing that matches between these players often have decisive sets due to their contrasting styles—Yazdani’s offensive approach versus Gagliardo’s resilience.

Similarly, the “Tie Break in Match (No)” at 79.30 suggests confidence that the match will not extend to a final-set tiebreak, possibly due to one player breaking serve decisively during the second set or earlier.

Set and Game Totals

The prediction for “Under 2.5 Sets” at 70.10 leans towards a quick resolution, potentially due to one player asserting dominance early on or the other succumbing to pressure in critical moments.

Regarding total games, both “Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)” at 57.30 and “Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)” at 59.00 indicate expectations of fewer games overall, suggesting a match where one player might take control swiftly or the match might end abruptly due to unforced errors or tactical superiority.